mrjaybeeze
Team Jetronic.info
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Location
- Norway
Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here
Thank you for being a part of our community!
I think the 1650 is too low. I'm running #80 injectors and have the constant up around 1850. With my #65 I had it up around 2100, and I left constant 1 alone.
I set IC4 to get a decent idle then modified the fuel table around that. I also set the parameters so LH ignores lambda at around 2-3psi so I can dial in the fuel table around it.
Jetronic.info seems to be down at the moment for me and my old tuning laptop died before I got all my current info off of it. I guess I'll email Gary or you to get it? Or maybe someone can attach it to a post here?Hi
There are also a checksum plugin that IpDown made for the Tunerpro.
It is available on the site under the downloads/tools category.
It is called LHCSum.dll
To activate it you need to put it in the main tunerpro folder.
Also the actual XDF has to have it added under the checksum plugin option
When all is OK a simple save on the save icon will update the checksum then just upload again to LH to correct the used binary
YS
JB
THANKS GARY!!!Ok, lets see if that worked...
Should have the checksum file attached here.
Who? There are many options. I'm using a 951 fuel computer and a 146 ezk computer right now.What XDF are you using, and BIN?
Best regard: Jim
It sounds like you have a different problem. Did the car run properly previously? Boost leak?
Hi, quick question, has anyone tried a 951 chip in a 984 casing for lh2.4? I'd like to avoid copying the map to a 967 bin with the risk of missing something, whilst getting the e-fan to work (951 casing doesn't have the driver IC) and rescaling for 350cc injectors.