cwdodson88
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Location
- The Dalles, Oregon
An eaton compressor never changes the volume of the air inside the supercharger, it basically moves a fixed volume of air from one side to the other. If it is moving air faster that can be consumed by the engine then the air is compressed outside of the supercharger. With the bypass valve open, the only compression will be to overcome any pressure drop in the bypass valve. A Judson moves a fixed quantity of air through a decreasing volume inside the supercharger. Both move a fixed volume of air per revolution but manage to due it in different ways. A Judsun (and others) with the bypass open will produce heat from friction and compression while an eaton will only produce heat from friction.
Either way a turbo charger really is a more practical way to go, more adjustable power with better economy. My last few modern cars have been turbocharged and a much as the technology has brought us almost instant power, I really enjoy the quick response of the Amazon and would like to maintain that characteristic if I go forced induction.
Correct... but they seem to generate a ton of heat even if its only from internal friction. My AC guru had a thunder chicken super coupe and monitoring intake temps, even with the bypass open and the air to water IC, charge temps were well above his turbo SVO. But after he was done with frankensteining it and hitting the IC plate with the AC system refrigerant instead of water, the temps were a lot better.