![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Spotted at a local JY, what parts would I want to pull to +T my 244?
I'm probably pulling the FT too, that's an AW71 too right? ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
'90 245 340k mile DD '79 242DL '02 Trans Am WS6-Konis+Stranos, full exhaust, 353rwhp/373rwtq, Fikse FM5 '76 BMW R75/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Board Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Midway Between Baltimore and Washington, DC
|
![]() I was freezing yesterday morning at the Jessup Crazy Rays and I didn't see any rear wheel drive Volvos. Looked like they crushed a bunch of the import section recently and there were less cars in that section than I've seen before.
Good luck with the removal. I'm tied up with church and a family birthday party. The weather is supposed to be a little nicer today for you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Kapitän Klugscheißer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Varies
|
![]() Car is likely a 91+ but check to be sure; if it is, go through the hassle to pull the manifold + turbo, MAF, E-Fan + relay/wiring if you want it and intercooler if you don't already have one
Someone else may chime in but that's all I see worth pulling immediately. May want to try your luck at the ECU's but I don't know how far your patience may run Cheers P.S Grille and Fogs/Lenses for extra cool points ![]() - And yes the trans should be an AW71 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Boosting along.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ
|
![]() Any body damage on the car? If not, either engine/trans is most likely bad.
__________________
85 GLH 367whp 00 Insight mpg > yours. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Good point! Maybe I shouldn't risk the time, effort and money on it; even if its only 250...
I should probably just grab the other important bits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Things like injectors, intercooler, piping, the 'tee' piece for the pcv system, computers, coolant overflow tank, fuel pressure regulator, 90+ manifold, possibly turbo if it seems decent, downpipe..you don't need the innards of the motor but if you can get the whole thing (with computers) for 250 I don't think that's too bad.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
the real Towery
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VA, USA
|
![]() Is that 151,000 in 2004? How many miles on it now?
I'd rather have a B230F. If you pull an FT block, pull the head first and get a look at the cylinders. The FT blocks usually have more wear. An F block with the same mileage always looks better with less ridge. Our 24hr lemons car runs a B230F and ~12-14psi on a T3 using stock LH2.4 and 850 Turbo injectors. Don't need an FT block for a +T at "low" boost. My daily driver is a '92 w/B230F, 13c, ~8psi. I've put ~70,000 miles on the +T done by the previous owner. I haven't been to any Crazy Rays in months. I need a steering rack for my '92 240...might be getting back up there sometime soon.
__________________
1987 244 | Project Thread | The 87 | Now with 74 mods and counting 1992 244 | The 92 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Thanks for the info! It has 172k on it now.
So Is be fine just using an F block? Is the FT just sodium valves? What should I take from this 940 to +T my wagon the cheapest and with the least amount of modding? Im only seriously considering doing it now as a summer project along with lists of other things with the car and haven't done too much research. This ones at Hawkins Point, they had a 960 and a 244 a few weeks ago and plenty of 850s, now they have a 965, 964, 944, that 944t and a few 850s. Lots of bricks for such a small yard with I high turn over rate. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Quote:
I'll probably just grab what you said and the intercooler. Probably just leave the turbo and manifold if they're giving me a struggle, same with down pipe. I could get a manifold later and make a down pipe. What else guys!? I'm gonna grab that stuff in about a half hour! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Nothing needs to be 'modded' for a +t aside from making an oil feed and oil return for the turbo..some exhaust work as well. Everything should swap right over. Also, that car uses the late model intercooler which doesn't fit too easily in a 240. You could hack it and make it fit or get the earlier style intercooler that fits right in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Gotcha! I have a source for later blocks and they're not going anywhere for a while. These cars at crazy rays only last a few weeks if that.
I'll try and scope out 850 turbo injectors, would any Saab stuff be of use? I saw a couple yesterday. Will my 90 intake manifold work ok? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Quote:
So will I really need the computer boxes from this 940 or will I be fine with my stock 2.4? What's the advantage if any? Thanks for the help and sorry for the trival questions! I need to know exactly what and what not to get while I'm there and don't have much time for research. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Quote:
-exhaust manifold (check for cracks) -downpipe (unless you feel like making your own) -BOTH computers (lh2.4 on your 240 as well?) -older style intercooler because it fits easier, that one can work though. -all the intercooler piping/couplers you can grab -850 turbo injectors (you won't have to wire in the resistor pack this way) -Fuel pressure regulator -iac valve hose -pcv 'tee' piece -coolant overflow tank -grab 1 or 2 'nipples' from that manifold so you can feed your boost gauge and te compressor bypass valve. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland IN
|
![]() Did you grab the grille?
__________________
Trying to understand stupid people is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Yeah my 245 is a 90 so it has LH2.4, am I ok with that or should I get the 940 units? Are they also 2.4 or what?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Both are lh2.4 but you need the turbo computers because they have different fuel and ignition maps that a turbo motor needs. The NA ignition computer is too agressive (most likely) to run on a turbo motor, especially with the higher compression of an f+t motor. Both computers swap directly into your car. Then you can sell both of your computers for probably ~$50-80 together on here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kissimmee
|
![]() Quote:
Ok thank you very much! This should have me off to a good start! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
the real Towery
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VA, USA
|
![]() F block is fine for ~200hp. For ~300hp, you're going to need a lot of supporting mods, but it can be done on a stock F block. Just a bit riskier. MrBill put down 291whp on a '90 B230F junkyard block with 100k on it. Then when he pulled the engine, I used it in our road race car. In other words, it survived 23psi from a Holset.
You need the fuel ECU located in the passengers side footwell, and you need the ignition ECU located under the steering column. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland IN
|
![]() I think he's referring to B230F compared to B230FT.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
|
![]() Assuming the ft block is a factory turbo motor, it's just lower compression so it's more knock resistant. You cannot (without $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$) get 300 hp on an NA b230f..f+t motors can make the same power an ft block can, just riskier due to the higher compression. That's all in the tune, right?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Kapitän Klugscheißer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Varies
|
![]() B230F vs FT Block Differences
At a glance for those who don't want to read further (Thanks again, Towery) : 93Volvo240 - Regarding the latter post, you can modify timing and add fuel as needed, for 250 WHP it's more safeguarding things once you begin to add more boost, but I'll stick to KISS and not clutter the thread further. Last edited by MDVLN; 03-30-2015 at 01:41 AM.. Reason: KISS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|