![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Happy playing the blues
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: S NJ, a suburb of Phila.
|
![]() I follow you. The 75 B20F had both the side of the block breather box and the oil filler cap breather.
Just an FYI, I tried the 74-75 tall oil filler cap on my setup and it didn't work well. It seemed to get too much oil trapped in the separator part of the cap. It would leak out and get all over the valve cover. I changed to the earlier type cap and it's worked fine on my wagon for years.
__________________
Dave, 1982 242 turbo. 338k miles. MVP coilovers and 3" exhaust. Flowed 405 with a V15. Cossie turbine housing with upgraded compressor housing. 90+, IPD remote oil filter. Some other goodness, too. Been lots of fun over 25 years. Restored in 2k. Now ready for a 2nd restoration. 1993 245 Classic, 430k miles, enem V15. IPD bars and chassis braces. Simons sport exhaust from Scandix. sbabbs ezk chip. Been a good road warrior. Genuine Volvo rebuilt leaky M47. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() I suspect that setup was used in countries with "low emission requirements."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Quote:
"Well K&N makes such a creature that fits the B18 and B20 engines, part # 62-1330. It fits perfectly on the oil filler cap." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Dave - In this diagram at bottom, it shows the cap is suppose to suck air via fresh air intake
Last edited by 84B23F; 06-14-2020 at 09:40 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Happy playing the blues
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: S NJ, a suburb of Phila.
|
![]() Yes, I know that setup well. I have also used the mini filter on mine to try it out when I had my 123GT. Mine on my 245 is doing the reverse by venting the fumes out of the valve cover and it works fine as an oil separator. Except for when I tried out the 74-75 tall cap. That one may only work for the fresh air in I guess.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() If an engine's Oil-Separator-Box's Return-Hose was plugged in oil pan....I'd modify what VQ did here, and suck blow-by out of fuel pump port with a hose going vertically that has the flame trap kit hooked to it (flame guard, with vacuum hooked up), then hose it over to air intake hose....and plug PCV Oil Trap.
That flame guard is restricting total amount of blow-by...too much, and your AMM is under-seeing total air....and a new AMM won't make it run better. thanks for tidbits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Have you seen this setup? Just installed it today using a B18 valve cover cap, then a Ford PCV End Assembly (Dorman 46017), with vacuum hose inserted into PCV end assembly and taped with electrical tape. This 1990-240 is my "Sunday/Trip" driver, so I haven't tested it yet.
Engine is dripping oil at rear crank seal, so I'm reducing blow-by pressure to see if blowby is the reason why. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oxnard, SoCal
|
![]() ^^^ I believe with that setup there will be a lot of oil in the intake manifold. At the very least route it through the cheap $20 ebay catch can.
And also that vacuum fitting is too small for the blow by to pass through. For testing purposes only I would vent it into a plastic bottle just to see how much oil you're gonna get.
__________________
Feedback: http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=341280 Last edited by PCH; 09-28-2020 at 09:31 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Quote:
A semi-truck valve stem was used, and a plate riveted inside valve cover (prevent oil from splashing upwards, along with stainless steel scrubbing pad (Scotch Brite) inserted above plate, which is not seen. It has worked fine. I'm just experimenting currently...I will be monitoring oil consumption. Engine is not an oil burner, and has plenty of power, but oil rings might be sludged a pinch. I'm just doing a quick test to rule out blow-by or not...if blow-by, I will re-ring engine.. Last edited by 84B23F; 09-29-2020 at 12:07 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Happy playing the blues
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: S NJ, a suburb of Phila.
|
![]() If you check out the operation of the B18 pcv hose oil cap setup I was referring to. The direction of the gases at idle are to suck the fresh air into the engine from the pcv oil fill cap. However, at higher rpms above idle the fumes reverse direction and are pumped out through the cap into the air filter to be sucked into the engine.
The direction reversal of the gases is also used by Volvo with the stock B230F pcv setup. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Without taking apart a B18 valve cover cap, I suspect its an open passage way without a flapper valve within. At least on a vintage cap
On B18 setup, intake suction was used at bottom of block, so yes, valve cover cap would be sucking filtered air until 'excess' blow-by existed, then it would blow blow-by into air filters' cavity. RE: "...reversal..gases....stock B230F pcv setup." If so, then a "vintage cap" may loose its flapper seal function, as in stuck closed on mine. Just an experiment....either real crank seal is shot, or increased blow-by exist. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|