home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > performance & suspension

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2009, 02:28 PM   #1
shellshock
SE 9.0 or bust
 
shellshock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Claremore Oklahoma
Default 5 cylinder T5 motor in 960?

So soon I will have a extra T5 motor from my brothers wrecked S70. I thought it may be interesting to find a 960 with a blown motor and swapping it out for the 5 cylinder T5 engine. I know I'd have to have the oil pan shortened, and probably work with the accessory mounting and stuff, but really, how hard would it exactly be? Would/could the T5 motor use the 6 cylinder mounting spots and stuff? Would I use the COP and remove the dizzy from the T5 motor? Would the Dizzy even clear the firewall?

Just kinda wondering. I'd love to shove that motor in my 240 but I don't have the skill for that
__________________

-Gabe W.
2001 Mercedes Benz S500
1992 244 turbo
shellshock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:36 PM   #2
Karl Buchka
definitely a douche...
 
Karl Buchka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Default

You would still need to figure out the trans and EMS **** and the passenger side 960 engine mount probably won't fit the S70 motor. I'd say swapping a 5 cyl in to a 960 is only marginally less work than swapping it in to a 240.
__________________
No real power, just turbo shіt.

Whiteblock swap guide / Engine swap FAQ
Karl Buchka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:50 PM   #3
fisky52688
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Buddy!
 
fisky52688's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cape Cod & Rhode Island
Default

ummm why not keep the 6?
__________________
87 244 Shiny paint, slightly modified.
fisky52688 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:54 PM   #4
Mueller
It's Serious !!!
 
Mueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Antioch, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fisky52688 View Post
ummm why not keep the 6?

he does not have a 6 to keep
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V, outside agitator View Post
Amazing amount of overthinking, under-doing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fige View Post
WHY THE ****! WHy the hell do you have to mention your 9series, AND always along with the fact that it has an m90. WTF! lol
Mueller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:00 PM   #5
shellshock
SE 9.0 or bust
 
shellshock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Claremore Oklahoma
Default

Cool Karl. I was reading your whiteblock in a 240 article and I remember reading something about the 850 motor having a different mount. I do have a yellow R with a good motor as well that I've been considering parting out as well. Would this motor be more suitable?

And yeah, I'd say I could just buy a T6 engine and stick it in a 960, but I just want to shove these spare whiteblocks I have into something

and Could I just not use the 6 cylinder auto trans that the car would already have in it?
shellshock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:03 PM   #6
fisky52688
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Buddy!
 
fisky52688's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cape Cod & Rhode Island
Default

he doesnt have the car yet either. Maybe trade someone the engine for a 6cyl? or maybe sell it and get a 6cyl
fisky52688 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:30 PM   #7
spe1983
Board Member
 
spe1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Default

Ummm, use welder in garage and profit. I think we could get an ecu reflash to remove the tranny trouble. Then we would just need to bolt a big turbo, and figure out an intake manifold along with the mounts and oil pan. Pick up that Turbo coupe tranny and lets get it to fit.
__________________
1972 142 w/ 128K, Manual done, MSNS done,
1984 242T w/ everything from my '90 245 w/ 253K
1994 855T W/ 202K, nothing done, DD
spe1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:03 PM   #8
Karl Buchka
definitely a douche...
 
Karl Buchka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shellshock View Post
Cool Karl. I was reading your whiteblock in a 240 article and I remember reading something about the 850 motor having a different mount. I do have a yellow R with a good motor as well that I've been considering parting out as well. Would this motor be more suitable?

And yeah, I'd say I could just buy a T6 engine and stick it in a 960, but I just want to shove these spare whiteblocks I have into something

and Could I just not use the 6 cylinder auto trans that the car would already have in it?
The R should have the right hardpoints for the 960 mounts. You still need to **** with the water transfer tube, the intake manifold will be all wrong, and it might not clear the steering rack.

The 960 trans will bolt up, but controlling it could be an issue. Paddle shifters obviously work, but if you're not interested in that you could have a problem.
Karl Buchka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:47 PM   #9
500dollar744ti
still rides with MrDoug
 
500dollar744ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fairfax, VA
Default

jeeps and toyotas use a seperate trans control module to activate the aw-30/43... the jeep one is extremely simple and has potentiometers to adjust shift points and such. just an idea if you want to keep it simple.
__________________
-Matt

1989 744T- 16v turbo, '94 FD-block, RSI pistons/rods, GT35R, Tial 38mm, RFL, MSnS-E, 100lb delphis, bondo header, 12x24x3 ebayIC, w/c t5, clutchnet 4puck/PP, 4.10 locker- 165k
1984 764GLE- V8 turbo, 306ci, GT40 heads, TRW forged, FMS cam/springs, MSnS-E, 52lb delphis, BW T04b, RFL, Evo 38mm WG, 31x12x4 ebayIC, 354whp/462wtq- 142k
1987 Jeep Wagoneer XJ Ltd- 4.0L, aw4, nv242, 2x lockers, '95 cam/head- 142k
1993 Crown Vic P71- stock- 287k
500dollar744ti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:21 PM   #10
CHESH740R
Board Member
 
CHESH740R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: England, that little island that everyone fled except me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Buchka View Post
The R should have the right hardpoints for the 960 mounts. You still need to **** with the water transfer tube, the intake manifold will be all wrong, and it might not clear the steering rack.
I think its hit and miss with the engine mounts, well dependant on when the car was registered, or the change over date is somewhere mid 1996, as i bought another engine from a 1996 car like the one in mine and it was missing all the engine mounts.
__________________
& & @

87 745 Turbo & 88 744 Turbo & 96 945 Sport Turbo

1 RIP, 1 mutating and 1 Daily Driver!!!!
CHESH740R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:12 PM   #11
Korruption
Newbie
 
Korruption's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dayton Ohio
Default

X
__________________
1998 V70 XC - 215K (DD)
1996 960 - 226K (Project)
http://www.lucasturner.com

Last edited by Korruption; 11-04-2009 at 12:53 PM..
Korruption is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:03 PM   #12
Alex Buchka
5 cylinders
 
Alex Buchka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Default

What "mini distributor" are you talking about? All whiteblock sixes have coil on plug.
Alex Buchka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:20 PM   #13
RP242T
Board Member
 
RP242T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Default

Thats what you get when a newbie opens their mouths. Mini distributor? What the hell is that? Something out of a Cooper S ?
__________________
1980 242 GT Turbo
2006 Mini Cooper S GP number 1148
1989 240 Wagon " The Beast" Daily Driver
RP242T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:24 PM   #14
DrvSfly
Board Clown
 
DrvSfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: I'm a Mobillionaire!
Default

They are like regular 960 distributors, only really really tiny. exactly what you think it is...
__________________



Quote:
Originally Posted by badvlvo
I tell her to STFU and get back in the kitchen. There is ALWAYS something to do in the kitchen.

780 Owner's Group
DrvSfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 11:37 AM   #15
Korruption
Newbie
 
Korruption's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dayton Ohio
Default

X

Last edited by Korruption; 11-04-2009 at 12:53 PM..
Korruption is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 11:42 AM   #16
Karl Buchka
definitely a douche...
 
Karl Buchka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Default

Holy ****. "Mini distributor."
Karl Buchka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:16 PM   #17
shellshock
SE 9.0 or bust
 
shellshock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Claremore Oklahoma
Default

shellshock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:50 PM   #18
Captain Bondo
Silly Boy/Youngster
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

Last I check the 6 needed the micro actually. If packaging is a concern you can go nano but that **** is expensive.
__________________
-Kenny

1983 240DL-T6

388whp @ 16psi, Mustang Dyno.
13.4@113

Stock junkyard motor. Header. Megasquirt. 960 cams.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pennybridge Pioneer View Post

silly, Ken Block Teamworks Collection pants
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:45 PM   #19
84 Blue 240
Board Member
 
84 Blue 240's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo View Post
Last I check the 6 needed the micro actually. If packaging is a concern you can go nano but that **** is expensive.
I had a lulz.
__________________
84 Blue 240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 05:25 AM   #20
Turbeam
Board Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default

OK, that was a bit of a gaff, but isn't it possible just to point it out or correct it without half a dozen following posts taking the piss every time? Isn't it being just a little harsh and unnecessarily critical?

While I'm sure there is a large amount of collective knowledge and wisdom on this site, I doubt if many are truly 'expert' in every area of our technical interest, and they shouldn't be expected to be.

Aren't these kind of threads better suited to pooling experience, ideas and information on many aspects of the cars rather than just taking any opportunity to shoot down in flames anyone who gets something a little wrong while seeking advice? That can't be good.

I have to say, this kind of thing sometimes makes me wonder if some of the responses aren't so much smart as smart-arse.
Turbeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:54 AM   #21
Karl Buchka
definitely a douche...
 
Karl Buchka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbeam View Post
I have to say, this kind of thing sometimes makes me wonder if some of the responses aren't so much smart as smart-arse.
You're just starting to realize this?

He was trying to be helpful, which is great. It just happened to come out in a funny way.

Save for RP242T's post, which is just a dickhead comment, all the others fall under harmless ribbing.
Karl Buchka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 12:45 PM   #22
Captain Bondo
Silly Boy/Youngster
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

It's an internet forum not a university.

We're here for entertainment purposes first. So yeah, "taking the piss" is a big part of it.

If you learn something then great but overall it's just a message board. There are better ways to gather technical info.
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 06:30 PM   #23
Turbeam
Board Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Buchka View Post
You're just starting to realize this?

He was trying to be helpful, which is great. It just happened to come out in a funny way.

Save for RP242T's post, which is just a dickhead comment, all the others fall under harmless ribbing.

I wasn't referring to Alex's original reply at all, which was perfectly fair and simply points out the fact that the sixes don't have distributors.

Its also OK to have a bit of a joke about it too, but I found RP242T's reply in particular a bit too cutting to take as being light hearted. I note that the posts in question have now been ommitted, and think that it is a bit of a shame if someone who is interested in these cars has been discouraged in any way by this sort of response.


I'm not suggesting that the forum needs to be formal or anything like that either, but the fact is that it IS a really good way to get real world info from people who have experience of doing similar things in a similar way and for similar reasons. You can't get that from any technical sheet, even if it does sometimes needs to be taken with a large pinch of salt.

As an old fogie with some 30 years of motorsport experience (and some notable success) behind me , I know that I still learn something new most days, and still have much to learn in some areas as well!
I just feel it wouldn't hurt to show a little more patience to those who are interested in learning something at a time when there has never been more to have to take in, and when the thread is after all in the 'performance and suspension' section.


Anyway, didn't mean to get so heavy, just a point.....
Turbeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.