home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > performance & suspension

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2005, 03:47 PM   #1
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default Bilsport's pics of modding M90- any comments/translation?

Just noticed looking through morley's pics in ot that pukema has the original "turbocontainern" article!

Anyways there are pics of what I assume must be the slipring you weld up. It actually looks pretty accessible.

http://www.pukema.com/bilsport/container13-3.html

From what I can tell they are suggesting you weld that ring to the gear in the bottom right pic.

Any help? Morely? Wagner? etc?

Thanks guys!

Anyways looks like they had a hard time with the M90... although it also sounds like they ran a 3 puck sintered clutch disc and were prett heavy-handed with it.
__________________

-Kenny

1983 240DL-T6

395whp @ 16psi, Mustang Dyno.
13.4@113

Stock junkyard motor. Header. Megasquirt. 960 cams.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Group A View Post
It'll cost you way more than that by the time I'm done.

Ever been clipped in the rear corner at 100+mph?
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 04:05 PM   #2
JW240
visst
 
JW240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Netherlands, Europe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo
Anyways looks like they had a hard time with the M90... although it also sounds like they ran a 3 puck sintered clutch disc and were prett heavy-handed with it.

yeah they were very hard on the gearbox I think. Somewhere in the articles you see one of the guys writing down 'Be easy on the clutch' on a whiteboard, a lot of times. punishment
__________________
240 | 1991 | 257 KKm | B230F+T | M90H | fuel:E85
Amazon | 1968 | bare chassis | rust fixed | finished 2015+?....


My Gallery, Volvo and other stuff...
JW240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 04:09 PM   #3
frpe82
Guest
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo
...Anyways there are pics of what I assume must be the slipring you weld up... ...From what I can tell they are suggesting you weld that ring to the gear in the bottom right pic...
That is absolutely correct.

They say: "With a little bit of luck you have saved the broken gearbox from being thrown at the scrap yard, or saved a perfectly healthy gearbox from future disaster."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 04:14 PM   #4
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

wicked. thanks! So it looks like you can get at it pretty easily with the rear half of the case removed... that is cool.

And yeah that picture is hilarious. Says something like "I will not sidestep the clutch" or something. lol
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 05:30 PM   #5
Alex Buchka
5 cylinders
 
Alex Buchka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Default

it basically says place the sync-ring on the gear as shown and burn it in with a mig, one gear tooth at a time, rotating all the time for cooling purposes etc. it also says to leave the case full of oil to stop any welding splatters from getting jammed inside the gearset and to aid in cooling the shaft whie welding. then just drain the case and re-assemble it.
Alex Buchka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 07:46 PM   #6
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

Sounds like a good plan.
Although it looks like they shredded the M90 anyways. :eek:
The bottom right pic here isn't confidence inspiring:
http://www.pukema.com/bilsport/container17-2.html

Something about they hope is was tired or old... next box will be a rebuilt one... or something..
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 07:56 PM   #7
Dfer10
# 2961
 
Dfer10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Default

so welding that slip ring allows for what? handle like 500hp?
__________________
Devin
Gone But Not Forgotten
RIP 6-2006 93' 944
Big Turbo,
Manual Tranny,

now a yellow



Dfer10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 08:05 PM   #8
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

It's entirely a function of traction I think.

The "Jesus' 242" uses an m90 and makes something like 700hp. Autotech is putting 700-800hp through the M56- which is pretty much the same tranny just with a fwd casing.

However, I was reading about some RWD S40 racecar that was eating M90's laft and right with a slightly modded t6 motor (388hp) I don't know if they were modding the M90's though. They also broke several getrags however so I think the were pounding it pretty good. T6 motors are apparently hard on transmissions.

That car in bilsport was 400hp on slicks, and from what I can tell they were beating the ever-loving piss out of it running 11's when it broke. there is the slipring mod and a mod to the selector as well. I've also heard Steffanson sell brass synchros for them.
I think you could build one to hold 500hp provided you did show it do much disrespect. You could potentially break just about anything with 500hp if you try hard enough imo.
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 08:12 PM   #9
Boosted2003
Board Member
 
Boosted2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cocoa/Pensacola, Florida
Default

Is it saying on the white board. No more side stepping?
__________________
2006 VW Passat 2.0t 6 Speed - Current
2005 Dodge Magnum R/T - Sold
2005 Dodge Ram 2500 - Sold
1998 Dodge Ram 1500 - Sold
1990 Volvo 760 Turbo - Sold
Boosted2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 08:17 PM   #10
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

yes. check a few posts up.
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 04:22 AM   #11
Wagner
Tbricks MIG Welding Champion
 
Wagner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Suomen Åbo
Default

When i did that, i couldn't do it exactly the way they did it in bilsport. I had to dismantle the transmission completely to have acces to that ring. (because a gear made it impossible to remove something, which made it impossible to remove something else. I don't remember the details, i have pics of this though somewhere).

It was easier to weld it that way though.

I'll try to find those pics and scan them over the weekend. Anyone wanna host them?

They broked the m90 by giving it alot ov revs and letting the clutch up fast. It was the 1st gear that let go, which usually does not break down on these trannies.
__________________
The long therm benefits of sunscreen have been proved by scientist.


Last edited by Wagner; 10-06-2005 at 06:45 AM..
Wagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 06:24 AM   #12
U.N.C.L.E.
Board Member
 
U.N.C.L.E.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norway
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfer10
so welding that slip ring allows for what? handle like 500hp?
It just allows more violent use of the stick, keeping the sync-ring in place. Power handling stays the same.

The m90 is over-rated here on the board. Get a 265 or higher instead
U.N.C.L.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 04:04 PM   #13
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

Ok thanks wagner! yeah if they broke first gear that was just due to be psychotic for sure.

I'm tempted to pull the rear part of the case off today and do some exploration...

Uncle, my understanding is that the majority of M90 failures occur from a partial/poor engagement into 3rd gear and then applying power, or breaking the selector fork again becuase of poor synchro engagement. The modification tends to ensure that 3rd gear engages correctly during a fast shift, so yes you can be more violent as you say, but I think that indirectly represents the box being able to hold more power as it is the shoddy engagement that creates a weak link most of the time.

As I mentioned with that RWD S40, they broke M90's and tried getrags and broke them too. I think if you're capable of breaking one, you're capable of breaking the other for the most part, but new m90 guts are cheaper at least for me. Although there are plenty of modifications around for both boxes so comparisons are tough.

But short of bilsport stripping 1st gear, the 7 or 8 M90 failures I've seen documented were all related either to the slipring on 3rd gear or the shifter fork itself (which itself may have failed due to a jam up caused by the slipring).


If you are breaking M90's independent of the shifter linkage itself, I honestly think a T56 is your only hope for a street car. Even tremecs that are supposed to be "street boxes" shift like garbage and are very expensive. T56 is about the only OE quality box that will hold the juice. But that is an expensive piece as well along with some seriously custom gear to fit it (It'd be shocked if it clears a 240 trans tunnel).

It might become the only option but they're just so huge and heavy.
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 04:15 PM   #14
blu92in99
I hate you all, equally.
 
blu92in99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wagner
I'll try to find those pics and scan them over the weekend. Anyone wanna host them?
If you don't have a pic host yet, email 'em to me. I'll host them on my pbase account.

blu92in99 (at) yahoo.com

-or-

jhinkley (at) alldata.com



-Justin
__________________
-Justin
'83 242Ti - The Never Ending Story Project Car. Too much to list.
'71 142E - MS'd B20E, M41. Some cool stuff already, lots-o-goodies waiting to go on.
'89 745Ti - Daily driver. M46, iPd sways, Bilstein HDs, JoeP MBC, cut springs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo
I'm not your mom, I don't print out pictures of your stuff and magnet them to my refrigerator and pat you on the head. Deal with it you pussy.
blu92in99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 04:19 PM   #15
acbarnett
SAAB defector
 
acbarnett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: L-town in the M-hizzie
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo
It might become the only option but they're just so huge and heavy.

you're telling me lol

I helped a friend drop and reinstall the t56 on his +T'd 2002 WS6 trans am last wednesday for a clutch change, that is a seriously large and heavy piece of machinery...

I'm just going to plan on the m90 for now out of ease of installation, if I break it, hopefully an adaptor plate for a t56 won't be too hard to make, I'm thinking you could possibly use an AW30-40 bellhousing or something.
__________________
acbarnett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 05:52 PM   #16
Hank Scorpio
Chubfest 2009 Survivor
 
Hank Scorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: deafing the neighbors, one day at a time.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo
It's entirely a function of traction I think.

The "Jesus' 242" uses an m90 and makes something like 700hp. Autotech is putting 700-800hp through the M56- which is pretty much the same tranny just with a fwd casing.

However, I was reading about some RWD S40 racecar that was eating M90's laft and right with a slightly modded t6 motor (388hp) I don't know if they were modding the M90's though. They also broke several getrags however so I think the were pounding it pretty good. T6 motors are apparently hard on transmissions.

That car in bilsport was 400hp on slicks, and from what I can tell they were beating the ever-loving piss out of it running 11's when it broke. there is the slipring mod and a mod to the selector as well. I've also heard Steffanson sell brass synchros for them.
I think you could build one to hold 500hp provided you did show it do much disrespect. You could potentially break just about anything with 500hp if you try hard enough imo.
Actually Jesus isn't making 700whp and the M56 is not as similar as you'd think.
__________________
off playin building geetar(s). bbl
Hank Scorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 05:53 PM   #17
Hank Scorpio
Chubfest 2009 Survivor
 
Hank Scorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: deafing the neighbors, one day at a time.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acbarnett
you're telling me lol

I helped a friend drop and reinstall the t56 on his +T'd 2002 WS6 trans am last wednesday for a clutch change, that is a seriously large and heavy piece of machinery...

I'm just going to plan on the m90 for now out of ease of installation, if I break it, hopefully an adaptor plate for a t56 won't be too hard to make, I'm thinking you could possibly use an AW30-40 bellhousing or something.
I think either using the AW bellhousing then adapter or adapter then a chevy/ford/bimmer/whatever bellhousing are about equally "difficult".

Doing a hydrallic clutch though with the AW bellhousing looks to be hte easiest imo.
Hank Scorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 06:36 PM   #18
mAydAy
Fabricatin'
 
mAydAy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Concord, NC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Bondo
If you are breaking M90's independent of the shifter linkage itself, I honestly think a T56 is your only hope for a street car. Even tremecs that are supposed to be "street boxes" shift like garbage and are very expensive. T56 is about the only OE quality box that will hold the juice. But that is an expensive piece as well along with some seriously custom gear to fit it (It'd be shocked if it clears a 240 trans tunnel).

It might become the only option but they're just so huge and heavy.




Last picture is the car it resides in. Ask Ravennexus about it, he knows the guy and knows more about the car. The T56 does fit, not sure what it takes, but it does fit.
mAydAy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 06:47 PM   #19
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

"Actually Jesus isn't making 700whp"

Oh, got me. "Only" around 600hk to the wheels.
The spirit of it was that it's enough power for the vast majority of projects out there.


"and the M56 is not as similar as you'd think."

Care to elaborate?
I've just looked at my M90, and I've had a couple M56's apart, and most of it looks the same- the mainshaft part is a bit decieving because it is seperate from the output shaft- the driveshaft output flange in the case of the M90 rides in a bearing in the rearward half of the case, and is then driven by the mainshaft- it's where the mainshaft on an M56 interfaces to the diff. The input shaft is different in a similar way, but the back end of the mainshaft and the front end of the countershaft sure look the same to me.

So they look very different, but from what I can tell the main and countershafts are identical except for the ratios (which are the important pieces unless the input shaft brakes- in which case you're SOL ). You can sorta tell by how the rear casing half of the M90 comes off in such a bizarre fashion as opposed to just about any "normal" tranny that volvo, being the typical cheapasses they are, did not change much at all, and it's modular in the same way the motors the m56 and m90 were bolted to.

I obviously can't be 100% on this as I haven't had them both apart on the bench side by each with a micrometer, but I have seen both sets of guts firsthand and they look like they interchange. But have if you have measured them or talked to someone who has, cough it up Dougie!


The AW bellhousing is nice in that it's a whole lot smaller than the t56 one which might mean less firewall destruction. However, as you know the AW BH is very "deep", typical of an auto BH because it has to house the TC, but the T56 has a very shallow bellhousing and a short little nubbie of an input shaft, so it might take some funy pilotbearing monkeybusines. The typical approach of using a motorplate insures that at worst you're only short by the plate thickness, depending on where the crank snout ends relative the the BH mating surface anyways.

Also sorry if I implied it wouldn't fit, I certianly didn't mean to I totally think it will I just meant it might take modding the tunnel some. Look at that big bastard! seeing it on a redblock gives a unique sense of scale. Pretty sweet.

Last edited by Captain Bondo; 10-06-2005 at 06:50 PM..
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 06:54 PM   #20
linuxman51
EGGhead
 
linuxman51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: mont, AL
Default

HAHA anyone else notice in the pic where hes writing on the board the *other* broken part?

Goddamn torque rods!
__________________
1990 740 GL Volvo Saved my life 5-13-2010

RAMMER JAMMER YELLA HAMMER GIVE EM HELL ALABAMA!!

http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=195282 Dyno Vid

10 Second volvo
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1...lvo_714020.htm
Plug and play LH 2.4 Megasquirt
ported volvo heads
linuxman51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 07:21 PM   #21
Hank Scorpio
Chubfest 2009 Survivor
 
Hank Scorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: deafing the neighbors, one day at a time.
Default

Im just going with who I've talked to in the know. Mikey @ Atech has dabbled with both. The m90's are only consistent for about 350-400whp according to Mike in stock form, the M56 with a LSD haven't broken for them yet.

I thought the 16vT car of Jesus was only putting down mid 5's and the I6 was undyno'd as far as I know.
Hank Scorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 07:33 PM   #22
Captain Bondo
Jackstand Queen
 
Captain Bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Default

Sounds pretty fair- although I'd imagine the gap in power threshold between m56/m90 might be the traction thing again- pretty different platforms between the FWD and RWD of course so IMO it's tough to say the M56 is stronger literally, although the ratios are different so maybe the gearset itself *is*- but even still it looked physically interchangeable design-wise at leats to me. That'd actually be pretty sweet if it were the case, as we got M56's up here in pretty ho-hum cars that get written off all the time.
Probably worth buying one just for a backup in the future, and if it's different I'm sure it'd sell to someone wanting to do a conversion.


Ah well I'll cross that bridge when I come to it- whenever that ends up being. Actually, hopefully I won't have to cross that bridge and it'll just behave.

There are two dyno graphs on Jesus' site, a low boost one and a high boost one, I think maybe the low boost one is mid 5's, but the high boost one is 595hk which I think is just over 600 north american horsepower.
Captain Bondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 07:39 PM   #23
acbarnett
SAAB defector
 
acbarnett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: L-town in the M-hizzie
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoop Dougy Doug
Im just going with who I've talked to in the know. Mikey @ Atech has dabbled with both. The m90's are only consistent for about 350-400whp according to Mike in stock form, the M56 with a LSD haven't broken for them yet.

I thought the 16vT car of Jesus was only putting down mid 5's and the I6 was undyno'd as far as I know.
so what about the shift gear reinforcements, what would that bring the power handling abilities to?
acbarnett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 07:44 PM   #24
Hank Scorpio
Chubfest 2009 Survivor
 
Hank Scorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: deafing the neighbors, one day at a time.
Default

I thought about that too, but the 800+ hp car was launching on wrinkle walls M/T's It stripped the splines off the axles but no real harm to the trans yet.

Course the wrinkle walls might absorb some of the harsness of a launch, but 800hp is 800hp.
Hank Scorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 08:01 PM   #25
acbarnett
SAAB defector
 
acbarnett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: L-town in the M-hizzie
Default

yeah, I'm aiming for only 400 wheel for daily driving with the potential for 500 wheel. It's just that running at the absolute limit of the tranny's capacity gives me the bigtime willies.
acbarnett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.